Editorial Policy and Corrections

Editorial standard

Neon Ogre content is written to be useful, cautious, and transparent. Pages should explain practical checks a reader can perform, not push urgency or promise outcomes. We avoid fake ratings, fabricated reviews, guaranteed language, and hidden commercial influence.

Sources and updates

When a page discusses exchange operations, we prefer official pages, public help centers, status notices, terms, fee pages, and direct route checks that a reader can repeat. Social posts and forum comments can be leads, but they are not treated as proof. Pages include updated dates and should be revised when a route, rule, or public signal changes materially.

Corrections

If a page is unclear, outdated, or overstates a claim, it should be corrected. The correction should preserve safety language and avoid replacing one unsupported claim with another. Readers can use the contact path to flag issues, but Neon Ogre does not handle account support or private wallet/account data.

FAQ